
Your people are already doing their best — yet the same problems keep coming back. We find what is really holding you back and rebuild it, so the improvement stays in place.
The M-B-E-A model is designed for one thing: transferring ownership to your organisation. We don’t measure success by what we do while we’re there — but by what still works after we’ve left.
Map
We find the truth in your operations.
Build
We design the system, the ownership and the routines.
Execute
We implement side by side and shift the habits.
Anchor
Operations run without us.
Anchored — by phase A, operations run without us.
Schematic illustration of the model — not a measured result.
Operational problems are usually behavioural problems. The system shapes the behaviour.
Manufacturing, trades, retail, administration or the public sector — we see the same patterns everywhere: the same problems return, operations depend on a few key people, and improvements don’t last. The challenge is rarely the craft. It’s the system and the habits around the work.
The methods have been hardened in some of the most demanding operating environments there are — grounded in Lean and Six Sigma. That is exactly why they hold up just as well in the office, in the shop, on site and in public administration.
We don’t publish client cases — discretion is a principle. The effect of the methods, however, is well documented in the literature. These figures show what systematic work typically moves when it is executed and anchored correctly.
−50–90%
Systematic changeover reduction typically moves changeovers from hours to minutes — freeing capacity without new machinery.
Shingo, A Revolution in Manufacturing (1985)
60 → 85%
Many plants sit around 60% OEE; world class is defined at 85%. The gap is hidden capacity that has already been paid for.
Nakajima, Introduction to TPM (1988)
5–15×
Value stream analyses typically show total lead time at 5-15 times the pure processing time — the rest is waiting time that can be removed.
Rother & Shook, Learning to See (1998)
94%
The vast majority of operational problems stem from the system and its structures — not the employees. That is why system improvement works where blaming individuals fails.
Deming, Out of the Crisis (1986)
Results depend on the starting point and the anchoring — no serious advisor guarantees a number. But the direction and the order of magnitude are well documented, and the sources can be verified.
We are not the right fit for everyone — nor should we be. We work best with mid-sized companies, typically 30–250 employees, where the potential is real but the day-to-day stands in the way of realising it. Here is when we are the right match — and when we are not.
By saying it up front, we save you the time — and ourselves an engagement that wouldn’t have lasted anyway.
Almost anyone can find what ought to be improved. The hard part — and the part that decides everything — is making the change stick when the day-to-day presses in. That is the discipline we have made our own: moving an organisation up in operational maturity by building ownership, habits and firm management routines into the operation — so the improvement lives on, even after we have left. Strategy is easy to approve. We stay until it works without us.
Most organisations hold far more capability than their day-to-day allows them to show. The capacity is there. The talent is there. What is missing is the structure that lets it come into its own.
Prozanta was founded on the conviction that stable operations set people free. When ownership is clear and routines hold on their own, capable people no longer spend their energy holding the day together — they spend it making things better.
Our job is to build that structure together with you and make your organisation able to carry it forward on its own. The goal is not that you need us. The goal is that you don’t.
12 years in regulated manufacturing
Lean Manufacturing
LEAN
Lean Master
Black Belt
DMAIC · DFSS
6σ
Six Sigma
Black Belt
Quality Management
ISO
ISO 9001
Certified Auditor
Failure Probability
FMEA
Risk Analysis
AIAG & VDA
The methods are recognised and well documented — hardened in some of the most demanding operating environments there are. What matters is that they are used properly, where the work actually happens — whether that is in the office, in the shop or on site.
The same problems return week after week.
Operations depend on certain key people.
Meetings don’t lead to action.
KPIs are measured, but no one follows up.
Too many tasks become urgent tasks.
Responsibility falls between two stools.
Decisions take too long.
Firefighting takes up more room than improvement.
The patterns repeat — and they share the same cause: it is not the will that is missing, but the structure and habits around the work. The system shapes the behaviour, and that is where the improvement begins.
If you nod to three or more, there is probably more to gain than you think.
Have a no-obligation conversationFixed, short meetings. Visible ownership. Problems that are found and solved once. Daily Management and stable operations are the foundation for everything else.
From firefighting to continuous improvement
Firefighting
Reactive
Structured
Proactive
Continuous improvement
We move you one step at a time.
0%
85% is world-class OEE. Many manufacturers run at around 60% — the difference is hidden capacity you are already paying for in wages, machinery and time.
Source: S. Nakajima, Introduction to TPM (1988) — the established OEE benchmark.
The day opens with a 15-minute board meeting: yesterday’s output against plan, the night’s stoppages, today’s bottleneck. Every deviation gets an owner and a deadline straight away. OEE is tracked with numbers — not gut feeling — and a CAPA routine ensures the same stoppage doesn’t return next week.
Same rhythm, different numbers. A short daily review of the case backlog, deadlines and handovers makes the bottlenecks visible before they become delays. Responsibility is tied to names, not departments — and follow-up happens on schedule, not when someone happens to remember.
“A presentation changes nothing by itself. The change happens in the execution.”
The change is driven by your own organisation. We train and support, so you can continue on your own when the engagement ends.
You know the price from the start.
We come back and verify that the improvement is still running.
You get a tool to verify that it is still running after we have left.
We don’t publish names, logos or cases. What we do at one company stays with that company. Discretion is part of what we deliver — and the most important proof is not someone else’s story, but what we find when we look at your operations.
Names, logos and cases never leave your company.
We don’t build our sales on other people’s results.
The most important evidence is what we find in your numbers.
So judge us on what you can verify for yourselves: our thinking, our tools and what we find in your own operations — rather than someone else’s story.
You don’t have to take our word for it. Use our tools and guides, and judge for yourselves whether we understand your day-to-day.
An open benchmark collecting anonymous OEE figures from manufacturers — real-world numbers rather than a textbook figure from 1988. Contribute anonymously and see where you stand.
median figures per industry appear on the index as more contribute.
Stable operations reach into several other areas:
We work in phases at a fixed price, agreed before we start. You only commit to one phase at a time and decide for yourselves whether to continue. No open-ended invoicing, no surprises.
A scoped potential audit at a fixed price. You get a clear picture of what there is to gain.
Once the audit has shown the scope, we give you a fixed quote for the next phase.
We implement side by side until the improvement sits in the day-to-day.
We verify that the improvement is still running — three months on as well.
You only pay for one phase at a time.
The price depends on the scope of the task — which is why we don’t set it up front. The potential audit does that: it gives you a clear picture of what there is to gain and forms the basis for a fixed quote you can consider before anything is decided.
Book a clarification callLean is a collection of methods (VSM, 5S, SMED and so on), while Operational Excellence is about making stable operations the norm — even after the consultant has gone home. We use the Lean and OEE tools, but anchor them in management behaviour and daily routines so the improvements last.
We map your value stream (VSM) and measure OEE — availability, performance and quality — so the real loss drivers become visible. You can get a first overview with our free OEE and downtime calculator.
Daily Management is a structured daily routine where deviations become visible and are dealt with immediately — from the floor to management via board meetings. It works because it changes behaviour every day, not just during a project.
The first loss drivers typically become visible within the first weeks. Lasting results depend on anchoring — which is why we build the systems together with your own organisation, so they carry the operation after we have left.
Our core is regulated manufacturing and industry, but the Lean and Operational Excellence principles also work in administration and logistics — with adaptation. We have experience with both.
It depends on scope and goals. We always start with a no-obligation clarification call, where we map your situation and tell you honestly whether and how we can help — before any plan is made.
A no-obligation conversation. We map your situation and tell you honestly whether we can help.